BlackRock and Vanguard Diverge on AI Stock Strategies

World’s Top Asset Managers, BlackRock and Vanguard, Offer Diverging Views on the Future of AI-Driven Equities Beyond 2025

BlackRock and Vanguard Diverge on AI Stock Prospects Amid Cooling Rally

As the AI-driven rally that pushed U.S. stocks to record highs begins to cool, BlackRock and Vanguard, the world’s largest asset managers, have taken opposing stances on what lies ahead.

BlackRock: Optimistic on Long-Term AI Growth
On Wednesday, BlackRock, managing $11.5 trillion in assets, expressed confidence in AI’s future. In its 2025 Global Outlook report, the BlackRock Investment Institute highlighted AI’s “buildout phase,” driving significant investment in infrastructure—data centers, chips, and power systems. They project this spending could hit $700 billion by 2030, 2% of U.S. GDP.

“We remain risk-on and are further overweight on U.S. stocks as AI broadens,” BlackRock stated, emphasizing AI’s potential to create new revenue streams and bolster economic growth across multiple sectors. Despite concerns over overinvestment, BlackRock believes market concentration in mega-cap tech doesn’t equate to market fragility when driven by transformation.

Vanguard: Caution on Overvaluation Risks
Conversely, Vanguard’s chief economist Joe Davis warned of AI’s potential to inflate stock valuations to unsustainable levels, drawing parallels to the late 1990s dot-com bubble. Speaking to the Financial Times, Davis suggested the market is overly optimistic about AI’s near-term impact, with investors pricing in a 90% success probability, while Vanguard estimates it closer to 60-65%.

Davis pointed to long-term opportunities outside tech, particularly in sectors adopting AI—hospitals, utilities, and financial companies—where competitive pressures could eventually temper returns for AI innovators. “Even if the technology is transformational, the stocks leading the charge could still face corrections,” he cautioned.

This divergence reflects the broader debate on AI’s transformative potential versus its valuation risks, shaping how investors navigate the evolving landscape.